Some expert believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. I totally agree because it has more advantages rather than disadvantages for several reasons.
In the one hand, the advantages of this essay is to prepare the children ability in language earlier. It is because the children will get many kinds of information from different person in the future. For example, Indonesian children are from variant language for each region. Exchange information would built around them as their association. At result, the children should adapt easily so that missed information would not be happened.
However, there are disadvantages on this problem. Firstly, learning different language make student unfocused. It is because they have to study more than one language whereas there are another commanding lesson at their school. For example, some schools add another mother language as curriculum lesson. In Indonesia, English language not the only foreign language at school lesson. But also Germany and Chinese language. Secondly, foreign language more difficult depend on educators or teacher. It is because foreign language would not use in daily life. For example, in public school they have to always speak Bahasa Indonesia although English Language have learned in their school lesson. At result, the children might forget other language slowly. This is the reason why several primary schools still recognize about entering foreign language as school curriculum.
From where I stand, I believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. The children will be more confident communicate with people even with foreign person.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie chart show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- The chart given below shows the expenditure involving in publishing a magazine Summarize the information 70
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'build'
Suggestion: build
...each region. Exchange information would built around them as their association. At re...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'lessons'?
Suggestion: lessons
...ge whereas there are another commanding lesson at their school. For example, some scho...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47619047619 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58957520008 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2649960198 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.75 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.65 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.554579153707 0.244688304435 227% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17403994771 0.084324248473 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175004749164 0.0667982634062 262% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.398230248943 0.151304729494 263% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164486578705 0.056905535591 289% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.91 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.