Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology. However, some think they do not have any benefit from this. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a common belief that the promotion of technology enables people to communicate with each other easier and more conveniently than in the past. However, there are some argument that they don’t have any profit from technological communication. I totally agree with this statement due to the following reasons such as generation gap and backwardness.
Firstly, the reason why I agree not all people can benefit from modern communication technology is that not all countries in the world can overtake with the global technological growth due to different reasons. Perhaps, financial status is the enormous problem preventing some countries from accessing to electronic devices which is used to make contact in daily life. Not only that, backwardness in some regions is also a drawback for individuals accessing to modern communication methods. A typical example for this is that some countries in Africa are still living in poverty or backwardness, so citizens in these regions can’t catch up with universal technological trend or afford to buy for themselves fancy gadgets. As a result, they are not able to get any profit from modern communication technology.
Secondly, generation gap is also the reason why I agree with the aforementioned statement because youngsters is the new generation who have been allowed to use electronic devices since they were young so there is no obstacle for them to use technological stuffs to communicate. While the older is the previous generations who can’t catch up with younger counterparts. A pertinent example of this is that although my grandparents own brand new cellphones, they are always looking for someone who specializes in technology to show them tutorials of using or downloading applications
In conclusion, it is really crucial to make chance for all people in the world to approach modern communication methods and propagate its significance
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 78
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 78
- The table and pie chart gives information about the population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas 67
- In spite of the advances made in argiculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...se technological stuffs to communicate. While the older is the previous generations w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 581, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...als of using or downloading applications In conclusion, it is really crucial to m...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n methods and propagate its significance
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35880398671 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19085305993 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541528239203 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.9042326669 49.4020404114 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.636363636 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27207726642 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112624792929 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817476595627 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158217278711 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865269902942 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.