Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology but some people have not benefited at all. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true to say that new technologies have had an influence on modern society, while there are others who think that they do not benefit everyone. Personally, I agree that the differences of access to technology between urban and rural areas are evident.
On the one hand, the impact that technology has had on people who are living in inner-cities had clear advantages. Firstly, the Internet allows business people in different countries to interact without ever meeting each other. This creates business opportunities for many individuals thus boosting many economies from the increased profits that are earned when goods and services are exchanged online. Secondly, services like Skype create new possibilities for relationships between students and teachers. This improves education in most nations because learners from poor backgrounds would be able to access professional educators for free and this will improve their academic performance. For example, a student can take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Finally, many urban people use social networks, like Facebook, to make new friends and find people who share common interests, and they interact through their computers rather than face to face.
On the other hand, rural communities suffer the most without access to the Internet. One problem is that challenges mostly happen when rural communities have a lower understanding of scientific knowledge. In other words, they might have rigid thinking against the benefits of the newest technology. Another key factor is that many students live far from school, and it is not cost-effective for telecommunication providers to lay fiber in the remote areas where they live. Although satellite is an alternative, slow speed and the expensive price is really limiting students to do their work.
In conclusion, technology has certainly merits towards central cities, whereas the outer-city still needs development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-23 | grahamoneil | 89 | view |
| 2020-02-08 | Christina.fyy | 89 | view |
| 2020-02-08 | Christina.fyy | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tween urban and rural areas are evident. On the one hand, the impact that technol...
^^
Line 3, column 1238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir computers rather than face to face. On the other hand, rural communities suf...
^^
Line 3, column 1831, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally limiting students to do their work. In conclusion, technology has certainly ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, thus, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56211180124 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04811568355 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621118012422 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1784480139 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.928571429 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8571428571 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359324640878 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132747948729 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.21686737735 0.0667982634062 325% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.583801860801 0.151304729494 386% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.416198139199 0.056905535591 731% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.