Some modern artists receive huge sums of money for the things they create, while others struggle to survive. Governments should take steps to resolve this unfair situation.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed that a number of artists in contemporary world are able to make a fortune after releasing new artworks whereas many strive to survive in life. Hence, governments should bear responsibility to equalise this unfairness. Personally, while I hold a firm belief that some artists can make more money from their products, it is unreasonable to acquire the support from the authorities.
For a variety of reasons, there are numerous artists who are capable of earning a remarkable income from selling their work of art. To explain, these people are often talented and have a large circle of relationships with their fans and business partners. In other words, once they release a brand-new product, such as a new song or a new painting, they be benefited from their current network, bringing them a huge amount of income. On the other hand, there are still artists who may find it difficult to progress in their career. To elaborate, these individuals may be gifted but for some reasons, they are unable to show their consistency and end up having a mediocre career. For instance, Susan Boyle was an outstanding singer who used to perform excellently in a talent show. However, her appearance and relationships in the show business may have stopped her from having a fruitful career after the contest and she may be remembered by only a few at present.
Apart from the aforementioned practical concerns, there are other more essential matters that require support from the government rather than this situation. To begin with, each country has its own major problems, such as finance or social issues. This means that instead of spending budget to help unfortunate artists, it is more important for government to provide different types of aids to their citizens. For example, spending national budget to provide free healthcare or education would be more meaningful to the people rather than supporting poor artists.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that while some artists can make a lot from their own products and vice versa, balancing this situation might be an unnecessary step for the governments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-28 | trikhung777 | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-20 | dangchan21 | 79 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | _sea.canary_ | 56 | view |
| 2020-06-12 | jeffhjz | 61 | view |
| 2020-04-11 | dieulinh75072 | 58 | view |
- The diagram illustrates the process of lithography a method used for printing newspapers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where necessary Write at least 150 words 86
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people argue that fashion items cost too much money Others say that this is acceptable because fashion is an important part of life Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 82
- Art is considered an important part of society as well as an expression of its culture Therefore many people argue that children should be required to study the arts at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, still, whereas, while, apart from, for example, for instance, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86272870716 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588068181818 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4767751016 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.533333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17276952866 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577679761482 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456613025759 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116695325608 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423549060773 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.