Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Nowadays, there are many organisations think that employees should dress smartly when go to work, but others think that the quality of work is rather important than the appearance. I accept that not only the appearance is important but also the quality of work.
Appearance is necessary for employees to work because a good-looking appearance can help to attract public attention and make us feel more confident when we do our working. For example, to have a good presentation, besides the content you had prepared carefully, you should also have a great appearance to take a deeper impression in the partner. With this, the partner will definitely concentrate on your presentation and then you can have the signed contract with their company. On the other hand, with a good appearance, we can easily build a friendly relationship with our colleague in our working place so we can integrate into the community.
Otherwise, I think that the quality of work can’t be missed. It can be seen that the quality of work will show our abilities, skills and knowledge and with this, our employer can know and treat you as well as the time and money you have spent. Because of this, some places don’t require employee to dress formally but in contrast they can choose every clothes they want if only they are suitable and they feel free when wear them.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the clothes employees wear are depend on their working environment. Both are good so we should balance between the appearance and quality of work to have the most effective working’s attitude.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | MustafaR | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | kamalcalc1977 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | kamalcalc1977 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | kamalcalc1977 | 11 | view |
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Underground Railways SystemsCityDate openedKilometres of rout 78
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.https://ieltsonlinetests.com/sites/default/files/2018-06/RAT1- 56
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Underground Railways SystemsCityDate openedKilometres of rout 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Write at least 250 words. 61
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, look, so, then, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9405204461 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7690900597 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53531598513 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0972899149 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.818181818 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242595703875 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106753280213 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845777014825 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182814899425 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951741872592 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.