Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In terms of dress codes in the workplace, people have different views as to whether employees should be required to wear elegant clothes or not. While it is necessary to be well dressed in some cases, I incline towards the belief that work productivity is more important than appearance.
On the one hand, many jobs require staff to look professional to portray an image of authority, trustworthiness, and diligence. It is undeniable that the way people dress can have a considerable effect on their customers’ impression and evaluation. Some professionals, such as teachers, doctors, or lawyers, for instance, are often expected to wear smart outfits. Otherwise, they may be considered as unqualified and unreliable, which can significantly affect organizations’ business. Therefore, for some certain positions, employees should dress in a smart and professional manner.
However, I would contend that relaxed dress codes can remarkably boost work productivity and efficiency. Casual dressing helps create an easygoing and creative work environment. In other words, workers do not need to worry about what to wear, which can be time-consuming at times. Additionally, this can also help workers enjoy more flexibility when working since formal attire, such as suits can be uncomfortable for workers. Take technology giants like Google and Facebook as an example; their staff, especially programmers and engineers, is encouraged to wear casual outfits, which can simply be T-shirts and jeans. However, they are always able to produce outstanding and competitive products and become leaders in their sector.
In conclusion, I support the trend towards the informal and comfortable way of dressing, but I do not think it is applicable to all occupations. Thus, enterprises should determine some suitable clothes for each class of employees based on their job titles and the type of work they perform.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | MustafaR | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | kamalcalc1977 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | kamalcalc1977 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | kamalcalc1977 | 11 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 63
- Many people are now spending more and more time travelling to work or school some people believe that this has negative development while others think there are some benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion 77
- Earlier technological development brought more changes to the life of ordinary people than recent technological development do. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university 73
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past 30 years in the world that many cities now are "one big traffic jam".How true do you think that this statement is?What measure can government take to address this problem? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... workplace, people have different views as to whether employees should be required to wear el...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49830508475 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2444060536 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620338983051 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.06042621 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.133333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16652492163 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582789489126 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504724686177 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110637414193 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335046612771 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.