Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above apperance.
It is often alleged to that visual aspect is not only essential in personal life but also necessary in working life. Some organizations think that their workers should dress smartly. Others appreciate the quality of work.
First of all, by requiring that employees dress smartly, it expresses the punctuality and responsibility of both workers and company where they work in it. Additionally, it will give them a professional impression and increase the prestage of workplaces that discipline is implemented effectively.
Secondly, people who works at the field of education and medicine should wear special as well as clean uniform in order to be a model for pupil and from point of view hygiene respectively. Furthermore, imposing particular clothes for staff members provide workers with safety. An example of this is that the workers of the branch of geology have to put on specific attire for protecting themselves.
Thirdly, it is common belief that dressing smartly at the workplaces prevent from discrimination. Morover, choosing a common uniform for all employees supports to attract people's attention, for instance, in manufacture, most consumers prefer the quality of product with reference to the outward appereance of it, as the result, organizations will capable of making valuable profit.
Opponents of this view argue that estimating something according to the outer appereance does not guarante the quality of work. Organizations should focus on the productivity of work rather than dealing with dressing smartly.
Taking these points into consideration, I consider that the appereance of employees has less value than quality of work. This is owing to the importance of growing profitability of organizations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-31 | O‘g‘ilsora | 78 | view |
- The graph shows the annual sales of hardware and software between 1992 and 2002 58
- The graph shows the annual sales of hardware and software between 1992 and 2002. 84
- The graph shows the annual sales of hardware and software between 1992 and 2002. 84
- The chart gives information about world spending and world population 81
- Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above apperance. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... view hygiene respectively. Furthermore, imposing particular clothes for staff me...
^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ranch of geology have to put on specific attire for protecting themselves. Thir...
^^
Line 4, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...instance, in manufacture, most consumers prefer the quality of product with refer...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for instance, as well as, first of all, with reference to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49063670412 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11824688695 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614232209738 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0202287032 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312537542113 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111637666199 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120773196626 0.0667982634062 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160192331471 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10229830108 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.