Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want.
Is this a good way to raise children?
What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older?
Different approaches to parenting have always been a topic of heated debates and disagreements.Some parents base the upbringing of their children on permissiveness, purchasing them any things and do not prohibiting anything. I am convinced that this way of raising children is not excellent and the consequences of the above-mentioned phenomenon will be discussed in this essay.
In my opinion, this access to education of offsprings can lead to a misunderstanding of values. The child will not recognize how heavy money is earned and will suppose that everything is allowed for them. In the future, such children may have difficulties with a career and providing for themselves, since they have no desire to earn. For instance, according to the magazine “Disobedient child” 60 percent of people who were allowed to buy everything in childhood are less successful in their careers and have lower incomes. Hence, career failure in children can be a consequence of general permission and failure to convey the value of things on the part of parents.
On the other hand this style of parenting can destroy the boundaries of what is permissible in children and conduct to spoilage. The child will stop considering an adult as an authority as well as will not obey and he may become uncontrollable. Moreover, it will be heavy for the offspring in public places and educational institutions and in the social circle he may be considered a bully. For example, doctor of pedagogical sciences Michel Borba claims that spoiled children do not understand the word "no" from adults and behave worse at school. Thus, children will not respect adults and will be harmful, which will affect their school performance and communication.
To conclude, way of raising children based on permissiveness make a child spoiled and lead to career failures.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-11-19 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
2023-05-04 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 73 | view |
2022-02-24 | ojehparvaz | 83 | view |
2022-02-24 | ojehparvaz | 73 | view |
2022-02-24 | ojehparvaz | 56 | view |
- There are more cars on the roads these days and more accidents are happening As a result some politicians have suggested that people should take regular driving tests throughout their lives rather than one single test What do you think are the advantages 67
- The government's investment in art, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. 89
- Some people think that new houses should be built in the same style as the older houses in an area Others believe that the government should allow people to build houses in the style they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Fossil fuels are essential for producing electricity powering industry and fueling transportation However one day we will reach a point when all the world s fossil fuels have been depleted How can we conserve these resources What are some alternatives to 84
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Some
...pic of heated debates and disagreements.Some parents base the upbringing of their ch...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21140939597 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22888026454 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563758389262 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0651127216 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333563775098 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113901707158 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711953486212 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201885019015 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596834535697 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.