Some parents think that it is good to have mobile phones for their children. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nodoubt, with each passing day, technology is developing. Every one have a own mobile phone. But few masses think it is good to give cell phones to their pupils but others disagree. This essay intends to highlight both the views in upcoming paragraphs and my forth at last.
The prominent point to be consisdered; communication. With the aid of mobile phones parents and childrens connect with each other and make a video call who living far away from. Due to this they cannot feel homesickness. Secondly, owing to the cell phones pupils do their studies methods and learn something extra not only in schools but also at their homes.
There are other reasons that parents think it is negative impact on their children's mind. Due to mobile phones they get distracted from their studies and playing online games on their gadgets. To add on, playing online games whole day it is bad effect on the juveniles eye sight and on mind. Last but not the least, owing to this pupils cannot connect with their family members as well as share their feelings with them.
Although, with the help of cell phones children can communication with their family members who living far away from and search somthing extra for their studies. But it is also bad impact on their eyesight as well as on their mind or studies through playing online.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-09-12 | sonia 7022 | 56 | view |
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both the views and give your opinion 56
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth 56
- Level of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world What are the reasons for this and suggest some solutions 61
- Below is a chart showing incidence of serious crime in a large UK city from December to november Total incidences of violent crime are show in addition to incidences of 4 serious crime types 73
- A large numumber of deaths are caused by roads accidents why do so many accidents occur make recommendations that would help to reduce the road accodents 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...echnology is developing. Every one have a own mobile phone. But few masses think...
^
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chnology is developing. Every one have a own mobile phone. But few masses think i...
^^
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...coming paragraphs and my forth at last. The prominent point to be consisdered; c...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesight'.
Suggestion: eyesight
...e day it is bad effect on the juveniles eye sight and on mind. Last but not the least, ow...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... mind. Last but not the least, owing to this pupils cannot connect with their family...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, secondly, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 230.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80869565217 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33903345524 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55652173913 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 506.74238477 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6523033575 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4285714286 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283896983145 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100876520168 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880910091568 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186127369669 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525498164702 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.