In some parts of world it is becoming popular to research the history of one’s own family. Why might people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development?
It is a hotly-debated issue over whether or not studying genealogy should be given more attention in this contemporary epoch. While I advocate that there are two main causes of this tendency, I am of the opinion that this trend can trigger several repercussions.
On the one hand, I hold a firm belief that this growing trend in investigating in family biography can be attributed to two predominant reasons. The main and perhaps the most persuasive explanation for this is that some people may grow fond of devoting their spare time to expertising in family’s history which is gradually invisible to the current and futuristic generations that is obviously entitling them to instill as well as gain an insight in numerous time-honored stories and cultural identity handed down by forefathers. Another reason that worth mentioning is that the one conducting research on family tree can stand a higher chance of being capable of raising awareness of hereditary diseases such as Down Syndrome or heart diseases so they can alleviate the potential health risks.
On the other hand, there are certain stands to support the view that tracing the origin is negative to some extent . First and foremost, there is no denying the fact that in this status quo, people are fully occupied with a heavy workload stymieing their partaking in recreational activities let alone squandering their valuable time on studying their family history. Addititionally, it is unequivocal that once they can figure out the various ailments that are likely to severely afflict them, they can be overwhelmed with panic and worry which prevent them from leading a balanced and gleeful life.
In conclusion, considering the aforementioned points, I contend that analyzing pedigree is a negative trend and there are two principal reasons for this
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-12 | chino0301 | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-20 | nhunghongnguyen14 | 84 | view |
| 2021-03-21 | Egamberganov Diyorbek | 91 | view |
| 2020-07-18 | ahsan042 | 56 | view |
| 2020-03-10 | uyen unnie | 46 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
It is a hotly-debated issue over whether or not studying genealogy should be given more...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ng the origin is negative to some extent . First and foremost, there is no denying...
^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are fully occupied with a heavy workload stymieing their partaking in recreationa...
^^
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., considering the aforementioned points, I contend that analyzing pedigree is a n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18707482993 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92124728883 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612244897959 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.6125519685 49.4020404114 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.444444444 106.682146367 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 20.7667163134 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149719156458 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608002934598 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280898007436 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837337459421 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303605389686 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.