Some people are born to be leaders, while others believe leadership can be learned. Discuss in both view and give opinions
In this day and age, possessing the ability of leadership seems to be more essential than others. The controversial issue is that some people claim leadership is an internal ability while others reckon it can be learned. This essay below will discuss both of these views.
On the one hand, headship can be formed through hands-on experience and knowledge accumulation. By interacting with real experience and social influence, a person can comprehensively become a man in charge without inherent capabilities. Moreover, interpersonal skill, teamwork skill, and problem-solving skill are able to be gained by enrolling management training programs which enable a person to discover and nurture prospective leader. This, most leaders might be the senior because it takes time to be accomplished commanders. Otherwise, these chiefs are experts in their area and qualify for their prospective career path
On the other hand, I strongly believe headship is inborn qualities. Though knowledge-based leadership has a great significance, it is the natural quality and distinctive capability of an individual that makes them extraordinary leaders. In fact, outstanding people are more likely to be remarkable managers than those who were leaders by their persistent effort. For instance, Bill Gate was innately a genius, he had a talent for coding and became a billionaire when he was only 26 years old. Hence, an inherent manager may find it more accessible to be succeeded in the career ladder.
In conclusion, it is true that one can be trained to become a boss. However, the inherent capability is an instrumental factor which distinguishes an ordinary leader with an outstanding one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-03 | khang.chautu | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-25 | www.www | 73 | view |
- Do the dangers derived from the use of chemicals in food production and preservation outweigh the advantages 81
- The charts illustrate how recycling is carried out in Eutopia and the pie charts show the percentage of recycled and unrecycled waste 82
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 61
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram shows the parts of a coffee maker 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.375 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18509706596 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632575757576 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5941141781 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.357142857 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279679093217 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947448592539 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884045221575 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166506180575 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10180625391 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.