The graph below gives information about international migration to the UK 1999-2008
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. Make comparisons where relevant
The graph illustrates about immigration, emigration to the UK and net migration between 1999 and 2008. Overall, it is evident that the number of people immigrating to the UK was higher than the figure for emigrating.
In 1999, the number of people immigrating to the UK was approximately 460 thousands people and only 300 thousands people emigrating to the UK, whereas the figure for net migration was just under 200 thousands people. From 1999 to 2003, the proportion of people migrating to the UK slightly increased, while the percentage for net migration was not significant changes.
In 2004, the number of people migrating on the network reached a peak at about 250 thousands people, compared with about 600 thousands people immigrating and 350 thousands people emigrating to the UK. The percentage of citizens who emigrated to the UK fluctuated between 350 and 400 thousands people throughout 5 years, reaching just over 400 thousands people in 2008. The figure for immigrating reached approximately 600 thousands people and there were only around 170 thousands people migrating on the world in 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-01 | duongtranbaolong29@gmail.com | view | |
| 2019-05-24 | www.www | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 67
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in EdmontonSummarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries 73
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 61
- the table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...higher than the figure for emigrating. In 1999, the number of people immigratin...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...migration was not significant changes. In 2004, the number of people migrating ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24022346369 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91751720126 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463687150838 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7129678215 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116669931095 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838503585688 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05005329076 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113431134312 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436401620274 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.