In many cities, there are areas of land that are used as parks. With increasing population levels, these areas would be better used to provide more housing.
Do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about whether government should replace parks with more houses or not. Personally, I do not agree that using the land of parks provides more houses, which would be better.
The main reason is that a area with high population should retain parkland to provide a communal area for many people who live in apartments or small houses without garden. Both the elderly people and the younger people can go to the park to entertain such as walking, doing exercise, playing badminton,…Besides that, they maybe meet some new friends and talk together, which make them relax after hard-working hours. Moreover, there are many trees in the park, so the air is fresher and health’s everyone are better. Parks are suitable places for almost people.
Another reason is that if the government provide more houses in a area without parks, people will face to some problems such as less job, pollution. For example, a city with high population will be polluted air and water more seriously. The amount of carbon dioxide emissions from the forms of transport and factories is increase so it negatively affect human health. Additionally, the high population is the cause of unemployment. The number of labourers is high, whereas the number of jobs is low, so someone has to struggle to find a job.
All in all, I think that parks should be retained to bring us more benefits.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-04-13 | www.www | 45 | view |
2014-11-26 | M.E. Faris | 73 | view |
- The bar chart shows the typical weekday for students in three different countries 82
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 56
- Some people are born to be leaders, while others believe leadership can be learned. Discuss in both view and give opinions 73
- The charts illustrate how recycling is carried out in Eutopia and the pie charts show the percentage of recycled and unrecycled waste 82
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others.To what extent is this style of management ef 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ld be better. The main reason is that a area with high population should retain...
^
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...lking, doing exercise, playing badminton,…Besides that, they maybe meet some new f...
^^
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Besides
...ing, doing exercise, playing badminton,…Besides that, they maybe meet some new friends ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...f the government provide more houses in a area without parks, people will face to...
^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
... factories is increase so it negatively affect human health. Additionally, the high po...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, may, moreover, so, whereas, as to, for example, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1167.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96595744681 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72351728489 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9969951055 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.25 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257776657897 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902062967141 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102144442004 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148403135937 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768142089603 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.