Some people argue that the government should spend money on public services and facilities, but not on the arts. Do you agree or disagree?
In numerous countries, investing in public utilities and infrastructure rather than in the arts has become a notably topical issue. Although arts play a unique role in modern life, they are perceived as a luxury good. To my knowledge, concentrating on public facilities yields not only social benefits but also economic values, and this statement indicates that this opinion is correct.
Firstly, public facilities are widely acknowledged as one of the nation's elevated development priorities. Particularly in developing countries, adequate funding should be directed toward public buildings such as schools, courts, post offices, libraries, parks, and so on. Because of the social benefits, these infrastructures are constantly standing for education and cultural activities. As a result, by increasing spending on aggregate works, the government is better able to meet citizens' needs and improve their living standards.
Secondly, in addition to the social benefits mentioned above, we must consider the economic value that public facilities provide to the community. As an illustration, an integrated transportation network (which includes maritime, land, inland waterways, and civil aviation) ensures the rapid movement of people and goods. Industrial and agricultural products can be easily exchanged and traded between regions. This example is the illustration of the fact that entrepreneurs, both domestic and foreign, will look at an area's infrastructure before deciding whether to pursue a business opportunity there.
In conclusion, it is self-evident that governments should prioritize social utilities and public infrastructures over the arts. Concerns about the quality of people's lives and urban development, in which businesses have an interest, are more pressing than ever.
- Some people argue that the government should spend money on public services and facilities but not on the arts Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that killing animals for food is cruel but others claim that animals are a necessary part of the diet What s your opinion 73
- Some people think that killing animals for food is cruel but others claim that animals are a necessary part of the diet What s your opinion 73
- Newspapers are having enormous influence on people ideas and opinions Why is this case Is it a positive or negative situation 89
- Nowadays some older people choose to live in retirement communities with other older people rather than living with their adult children Is it a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'areas'' or 'area's'?
Suggestion: areas'; area's
...h domestic and foreign, will look at an areas infrastructure before deciding whether ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87404580153 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18787299537 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690839694656 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6895069711 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.384615385 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164017224797 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512105381225 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370112035591 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945244169032 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264277776798 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.