Some people argue that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, and only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, with the upsurge in the awareness of the general public about environmental issues, the debate concerning the measures that can be done by governments or individuals has been intense. Some people are of the opinion that the general public has not the potential to combat environmental problems, and only governments and large corporations are able to overcome environmental issues. Yet to the best of my knowledge, I completely support this notion as one can see many facts if governments take this responsibility.
The first reason why individuals can do nothing to improve the environment is rooted in the fact that implementing an environmental policy needs a huge budget and modern-day equipment. For example, for solving the air pollution problem, if governments are willing to persuade citizens to commute by public transportation systems, at first transportation infrastructures have to be improved by adding modern electric vehicles, new bus routes covering all over the city and so forth. There is little doubt that only governments or large companies have the needed potential to conduct such huge environmental projects at the national level.
Another justification is that governments and some organizations, by setting out protective rules or banning the activity of some industries, have the power to fight with environmental problems. Attaching no importance to environmental issues, some factories release pollutants to the atmosphere or to water resources. In this situation, governments or a strict organization equipped with experts and state-of-the-art technologies supervise all industries, forcing them to obey environmental rules and charging them with high fees if they broke a law.
In the light of these facts, one can conclude that combating with environmental problems needs money, power, and modern equipment and obviously these requirements are not accessible and affordable for the general public. there is no point in denying that governments and large organizations are the best choices to solve environmental issues.
- Some people argue that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, and only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- tobacco is an addictive substance, but people have been using it freely.Some people say tobacco products (such as cigarettes and smoking pipes) should be made illegal.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- English is spreading all around the world as a global language. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- The only way to improve the safety on our roads is to have stricter punishment for driving offenders.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In recent years, with the upsurge in the...
^^^
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ith the upsurge in the awareness of the general public about environmental issues, the debate ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...Some people are of the opinion that the general public has not the potential to combat environ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... governments take this responsibility. The first reason why individuals can do ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mental projects at the national level. Another justification is that government...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...em with high fees if they broke a law. In the light of these facts, one can con...
^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e not accessible and affordable for the general public. there is no point in denying that gove...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... and affordable for the general public. there is no point in denying that governments...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60828025478 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38254493057 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56050955414 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2920396902 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.090909091 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5454545455 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256034737231 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100819884623 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554049096954 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148645246055 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491765737827 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.