Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will use up the world’s resources. Do you agree and disagree?
The issue of the impact of air travel on the environment has heated up in recent years, following the concern that more and more people turn to it as a means of travel. Restrictions have been preferably imposed on air travel, according to some people. There are some points in their argument.
The first is that aircrafts have been responsible for a large proportion of air pollution. Planes, either idling and taxiing, contribute a large proportion of local emission annually. Some might suggest that air is the only suitable mode of transport for long distance trips. This viewpoint is fallacious. Trains, for instance, serve as an optimal alterative, consuming less energy and causing less pollution
As well as air pollution, aircrafts can cause noise pollution. Although it is difficult to measure the actual impact of noise on people’s everyday lives, its ability to increase the anxiety and levels of annoyance has been confirmed. Especially to those living in the neighborhood of an airport and around the flight paths, noise created by aircrafts is indeed a headache.
Although travelling by air is likely to cause problem, it is not to say that air travel should be significantly restricted. Alternatively, air travel can be operated in a manner that its strengths can be fully taken advantage of. For example, by replacing old engines with cleaner ones, people can mitigate the environmental impact caused by flying. Meanwhile, aircrafts have a higher capacity, allowing greater numbers of passengers for each flight and thereby giving the best possible values to the fuel used.
In the light of the facts outlined above, substantial thought should be given to the problem of pollution caused by aircrafts. However, it does not automatically mean that air travel should be curtailed. Instead, people should make adjustments and improvements wherever appropriate to ensure the optimal use of this of travel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-25 | thienhanguyen | 84 | view |
- Environmental problems are serious in many countries. It means that the only possible way to protect the environment is at international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree on this hypothesis? 84
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones in communication has negative effects on young people’s reading and writing skills. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people strongly oppose animal experimentation believing that it causes pain to animals while some other people consider it necessary What is your opinion 77
- Some people think the developments of technology make people’s life more complex, so we should make the life simpler without using technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Although it is generally prohibited corporal punishment persists in many families Do you think corporal punishment is an acceptable way to regulate children s behaviours 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere are some points in their argument. The first is that aircrafts have been re...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...less energy and causing less pollution As well as air pollution, aircrafts can ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted by aircrafts is indeed a headache. Although travelling by air is likely to ...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...best possible values to the fuel used. In the light of the facts outlined above...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the optimal use of this of travel.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24919093851 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91593482867 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569579288026 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6849279476 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4117647059 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280061025373 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852625464727 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678447458346 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152247988881 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710380820584 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.