Some people believe that all children should have a pet or an animal to look after. Other people disagree, however, saying that this depends on a child's circumstances. Consider these opposing views and give your own opinion.
It is popularly known that kids may benefit by taking care of a pet whilst opponents argue that there are some requirements that should be considered before asking a child to look after a puppy. This essay aims to identify some aspects from both views that must be discussed in order to approach to a valid conclusion.
On one side, kids who are in charge of looking after a pet may easily develop some social skills such as empathy and respect that have a central role in the passage from childhood to adulthood: becoming responsible for someone whose existence depends on them, kids would be more compassionate. Furthermore, looking for a pet requests some practical tasks, for instance feeding them, keeping their supplies clean, scheduling vaccinations, might enhance their time-management skills.
On the other side of the debate, those who oppose this idea insist that looking for a pet should be a commitment suitable only in particular conditions. Firstly, parents should be involved in the pet’s caregiving by supervising the children’s actions. Low-income families that are concerned about their bills and taxes and that struggle at having enough free time to dedicate to their children are not the most suitable accommodation for pets. For instance, they might not be able to provide them with proper care or adequate spaces.
Overall, taking care of an animal is definitely an effective way to teach children some important values that are essential to growing up respectful adults, as long as families could provide basic requirements; otherwise, it seems advisable to avoid this option and find different opportunities to learn kids empathy and respect.
- The chart shows the percentage of drugs taken by girls and boys in a school in New Zealand.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that tourism benefits the host country Others think that tourism causes problems for the host country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 79
- The following table gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- Psychological illnesses may not be as obvious as physical disabilities or illnesses Nevertheless they are just as disabling in their own way Society however is more accepting of those with physical than psychological illnesses or disabilities the latter b 88
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, so, for instance, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27037037037 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90069997701 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.4481588245 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.111111111 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198521393632 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800478016588 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452462545278 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116874381655 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268598815964 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.