Psychological illnesses may not be as obvious as physical disabilities or illnesses. Nevertheless, they are just as disabling in their own way. Society, however, is more accepting of those with physical than psychological illnesses or disabilities, the latter being regarded as a “taboo” subject sometimes. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Over the past few decades, we have been witnessing a radical transformation in the treatment and, overall, in the apperception of mental illnesses: in the early 1900s, people with any type of mental diseases, such as mental retardation, autism as well as schizophrenia, were considered as “mad” and spent their lives in terrible and insane conditions confined in recoveries.
With the evolution of the branch of Psychiatry and the increasing knowledge on the causes of mental diseases, the assessment criteria have been enhanced leading to identify a more accurate definition of each mental diseases and to define its own treatment, both pharmacological and behavioural.
However, even though mental illnesses, affecting the communication, relational and social skills, can considerably influence the autonomy of the patient, these pathologies are still less socially accepted: even in these days, in consideration of the fact that they usually have a less-visible impact on the overall state of the patients rather than physical impairments, people struggle at considering them real diseases.
Furthermore, updated researches report that parents whose child is diagnosed with a mental disability are less keen on accepting it and, thus, to promptly start a rehabilitation programme: as a result, this approach further worsens the kids’ conditions who might feel not accepted and enhance the sense of “taboo” over them.
In conclusion, I believe nowadays, despite the significant rise of the average awareness on mental pathologies, they are still hardly accepted and, therefore, I think that more efforts should be done by local and national authorities to increase the mean knowledge on this topic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-28 | ieS | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-18 | doanthao2082003 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 92 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | cecilia | 88 | view |
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 84
- Some people think that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during term) are an excellent option for children while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 78
- Some people believe that all children should have a pet or an animal to look after. Other people disagree, however, saying that this depends on a child's circumstances. Consider these opposing views and give your own opinion. 67
- The following table gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67692307692 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30678878536 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 16.0721442886 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 52.0 20.2975951904 256% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.4363172384 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 295.2 106.682146367 277% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 52.0 20.7667163134 250% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 23.2 7.06120827912 329% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118458065033 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594564022015 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0137500077727 0.0667982634062 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0594564022015 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0137500077727 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.3 13.0946893788 239% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 1.78 50.2224549098 4% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 7.44779559118 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 25.9 11.3001002004 229% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.55 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.8 8.58950901804 137% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 31.0 9.78957915832 317% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 22.8 10.1190380762 225% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 31.0 10.7795591182 288% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.