Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People hold different views about saving and protecting wild animals. While some people are of the opinion that we should try to save all the wild animals, I believe that we should emphasize on saving some selective wild animals.
On the one hand, it is understandable why all wild animals must be protected. The primary reason behind this view is that all of them plays an important role in maintaining the balance of the ecosystem. In particular, the disappearance of a small animal in the food chain can lead to the destruction of a whole food net. For example, when bees are extinct, trees and flowers that are pollinated by this species will decrease in number dramatically. As a result, other animals that feed on these kinds of flora would be pushed to the verge of extinction due to the paucity of food. Another reason is that the existence of these wild animal is beneficial for human beings. Since not all wild animals are not examined fully yet, protecting them means that humans will have more time to figure out their special function that can be of later use
On the other hand, for a number of reasons others believe that not all wild animals should be preserved. Firstly, they believe that the overpopulation of some wild animals could become a threat for our existence. Take mosquitos as an example, there is no need to protect those which only spread malaria and seem to have no beneficial features to humans. Another example is the growing number of kangaroo in Australia lead to the chaotic of society, ranging from damaging the harvest to attacking people. Secondly, conserving wild animals requires a large amount of money. Therefore, national budget should be diverted to protect only endangered species such as pandas and blue whales. The remaining funds can be allocated to other humanity issues, as many third world countries are still struggling against starvation and deathly diseases.
In conclusion, In conclusion, although there are some good reasons to protect all species , I believe that it is better to preserve selected wild animals.
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ave all the wild animals, I believe that we should emphasise on saving some selec...
^^
Line 6, column 105, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...he main reason behind this view is that all of the wild animals plays an important role in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...damage the biodiversity of the world. In conclusion, a number of people believ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, third, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04012345679 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57540414758 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466049382716 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.272509234 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0625 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.540421845422 0.244688304435 221% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218578619808 0.084324248473 259% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107128068582 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342668810765 0.151304729494 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060821701973 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.