Wild animal protection has been an issue of public interest today. People differ in opinions: some claim all wild animals should be protected while others argue we should only protect particular types of them.
There are considerable reasons to support protecting all wild animals. All wild animals are important components of the whole bio-circle that humans are unable to judge their value from one to another. Wildlife is useful for us to understand the origin of life by scientific research such as genetic engineering. Particular types of animal may seem more essential than others in certain research like medicine, but things may be adverse with rapid development of science and technology. All wild animals generally function as a dynamic system in a natural environment, which usually works better under a high level of biodiversity. Therefore, protecting all of them can absolutely secure a desirable animal variety, which helps keep the natural environment and provides sources for human research.
On the other hand, protecting part of wild animals is a practical approach to implement such preservation. With limited funding and sources, sometimes only certain types of animals are able to get a priority of conservation, such as the polar bears, rhinos, and those under emerging threat of extinction. All wild animals are huge numbers which need to put large amounts of funding. It should be addressed in the long term and needs several steps. The first step is protecting smaller groups of wild animals and gaining experience for the future work.
To conclude, I think we should protect all wild animals eventually, but better take it step by step. First we start with protecting certain kinds, then use the previously successful experience to protect the rest. The two opinions of the issue are not controversial but about different stages of wildlife conservation.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 75
- City dwellers seldom socialize with their neighbors today and the sense of community has been lost Why has this happened and how to solve this problem 73
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 66
- In some countries most people prefer to rent their homes rather than buying them What are the advantages and disadvantages of renting a home 84
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, i think, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28903654485 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80915428156 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598006644518 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2638353246 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442034290511 0.244688304435 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151611474755 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105669430214 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308568627862 0.151304729494 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101879654211 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.