Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisons about matters that affect them.
Children represents the future of society. While some say that letting children to make decisions on matters like food, clothes and entertainment is likely to make them self-centered, it is still a contentious matter. Proponents argue that children should be allowed to make choices on matters that affect them. Despite it makes them self-serving, it will foster child's development as a whole.
A person who thinks about own wishes or desires is often regarded as egoistic. These kind of individuals only focus on themselves in extreme times. As an example, if a situation arrives in which a self centered person has to choose, he would always prefer himself over others. Children who inculcate this kind of behaviour will render themselves in a situation of becoming a social disdain. They will thus likely to loose an ultra important skill of social interaction as they only focus on their own needs and wishes.
However, allowing children to build their own choices will help them to acquire the ability of decision-making. This in turn will haste the development of their brain. To illustrate, children who acquired the expertise of making their own decision reported of having higher IQ levels compared to other children of their age. Hence, they prove out to be more independent. This surge their chances of survival in the world full of different cultures and societies. These children are more acceptable in society as growing adults.
To reciprocate, although permitting children to make their own choices leave them self-centered, it has other benefits towards child's growth in the long run. In my opinion, children should be encouraged to make decisions as to evolve their brain functions so that they succeed as an individual in today's world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | Razeenaj | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | mrittika1993dey@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-12 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | ashima1907 | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | ashima1907 | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 56
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 11
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is import 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
... desires is often regarded as egoistic. These kind of individuals only focus on themselves...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ocial disdain. They will thus likely to loose an ultra important skill of social inte...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, still, thus, while, as to, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16783216783 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84903893222 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566433566434 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5875532765 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9411764706 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354578374258 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104258222643 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747315012866 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205875242075 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233474842776 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.