Some people believe that to be successful at sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion ?

In the recent years, it has been observed that, playing any sport is essential for many things. Sports are of two types Indoor sports and outdoor sports. By playing sports one can rejuvenate to work or study, also by playing outdoor sports one can become healthy. To get success in sport some people consider that you should have natural ability while other thinks that it is the matter of practice and hard work. Here we will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of their views and will make conclusion in the end.

Natural ability can lead to success provided one should do hard work to learn the techniques. If one is having natural quality in some sports, he can catch the train easily. For instance, to play chess one should have good intelligence quotient, while in case of swimming one should have very good stamina to keep his breath for a long time and energy. Having such type of natural quality gives added advantages than others. Advantages is in the time required to learn that type of skill set will be less.

On the other hand, one who do hard work and practice, they will defiantly achieve the success. If one is being toil, then definitely he will get success. As we can’t commit, in case of those who are having natural ability, that they will do such hard work or not.

Considering above pros and cons of different views of people, I can conclude that, those who do practice and hard work has high chances of getting success compared to other who is having natural ability.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65789473684 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25374920828 2.80592935109 80% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522556390977 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6886540626 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294134977393 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111332763299 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984312026674 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185193713206 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748960311822 0.056905535591 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.