Some people believe that to be a successful sportsperson, one needs to have a natural ability. Others think that hard work and practice are more important.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Time is altering and so are the effective factors influencing athletes’ success. Whether a highly successful sportsperson is born or made has sparked a heated controversy the world over. Although it is stringently opined by some that having an innate talent in a specific field of sport can act as a catalyst for people’s triumph, owing to their capability to learn quickly compared to others, it will be proven by this essay that this may not be the case. In other words, untiring perseverance plays an influentially pivotal role in being triumphant in sports inasmuch as possessing this characteristic can fully compensate for the lack of natural facility for doing sport. Throughout the following paragraphs, these points will be meticulously scrutinized to advocate the latter adequately logical standpoint.
It is sternly postulated by some that a sportsperson should have a natural aptitude in order to make athletic achievements in their field due to their rapid progress, acting as an incentive, on the one side. Take a 15-year old swimmer, reaping the benefits of his raw talent in swimming, enabling him to learn faster than his peers with average skills, as an illustration. By this, he is highly likely to be stimulated, contributing to being a professional swimmer. It is exemplified by this glaringly apparent instance that athletically gifted individuals can achieve impressive sports success. Whereas this might be deemed somehow irrefutable, this viewpoint is strictly disagreed by this essay.
Being a persistent person is inextricably interwoven with outstanding athletics performance since this personality trait, without a shadow of a doubt, can make up for inadequate inherent abilities in sports, on the other hand. Ronaldo, a universally well-known soccer player, has acknowledged the fact that he has become a globally prominent player due to his countless hours of practicing, notwithstanding his insufficient gift in this sport, to illustrate. By shedding light on this example, it is crystal clear that diligent athletes, categorically, are capable of exploiting their full potential and become a successful sportsperson. Strong determination, thus, ought to constitute a major element in sports achievements.
To recapitulate, after the careful situational analysis of the paramount significance of hard work in athletics accomplishments, it seems that considering the innate gift is conspicuously superficial. Based on the aforementioned compelling grounds, it is, hoped these important points will be taken into account by coaches in the foreseeable future.
- Older people are waiting to be retired but when they get retired they feel unhappy Why this is the case What can be done to solve this problem 84
- Some people believe that to be a successful sportsperson one needs to have a natural ability Others think that hard work and practice are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information bu selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Older people are waiting to be retired but when they get retired they feel unhappy Why this is the case What can be done to solve this problem 89
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2207.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58734177215 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37431412794 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617721518987 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.732004772 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.9375 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6875 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149143768183 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463337305036 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314745997277 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884130639511 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250880539801 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.