In the salad days of the millennium, society is polarised into the two groups almost equally regarding the notion that having a good face is essential to achieve success in life. Different people have their distinct mindset. The following paragraph would shed light on both approaches before making a final note.
To commence with the first notion. There are a myriad of things to be shared in its favour. First and foremost having an attractive face can make some things really easy also gives people great opportunities to work in some good sectors such as Bollywood or Hollywood because in such industries good looking people can immense impact on an audience. As a result human beings with charming faces and bodies also earn a good amount of money just by doing small advertisements. Secondly, There are such job roles in which having a glamorous face is important for instance a receptionist job in which having good is mandatory or air hostess jobs. These are the jobs in which attractive looks matter because they attract customers.
Shifting towards the second school of thought having work experience and soft skills, such as leadership skills and other interpersonal skills, can throw the balance in favour of the applicant. Hence, in certain industries having job experience plays a huge role because the company will get benefits from employers who have great skills in that scenario good looks don't matter.
Having discussed the arguments and counter arguments, I would like to infer that good looks will take a person nowhere because beauty fade talent doesn't. To justify my state of mind there is an instance according to a survey of Forbes for the 100 most successful entrepreneurs of 2019, which all came from poor families and have achieved at high levels by working for 18 hours a day.
- The pie chart gives information on UAE government spending in 2000 The total budget was AED 315 billion Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The line graph shows Paris Metro station passengers Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Two charts below show the percentage of qualified graduates in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...ence with the first notion. There are a myriad of things to be shared in its favour. F...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...reat skills in that scenario good looks dont matter. Having discussed the argumen...
^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...rson nowhere because beauty fade talent doesnt. To justify my state of mind there is a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, look, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99669966997 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58726088689 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610561056106 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2035844063 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.461538462 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104646733733 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332012853971 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292167439043 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591425923633 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158509398962 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.