Some people believe that culture would be ruined if it is used to earn tourism revenue, but others consider that tourism is the only hope to protect a culture. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
There is little room for doubt that tourism is one of the fastest-growing industries in the world. However, its impact on the local culture still remains a subject of intense debate. In this essay, I will elaborate the benefits and drawbacks of tourism but personally, I firmly believe that if the government of a country can promote their cultural heritages simultaneously with tourism commercials, they can protect the long-standing traditional values of their country.
Providing economic incentives for cultural preservation is undeniably one of the primary contributions of tourism. To many foreign tourists, history and culture are what they first consider when choosing a destination. Recognizing this mindset, many tourism sites have enthusiastically promote their cultural heritages to the world to attract more attention. Additionally, the money earned from tourism will subsequently direct towards the maintenance projects for the local culture. Hence, tourism is one of the main forces contributing not only to the economic development but also the cultural conservation of a country.
Furthermore, tourism is the only way that makes an indigenous culture can be known around the world. Thanks to the technical advance, tourists can share their experience in the local culture via social media, such as Facebook, Twitter or Youtube, or they can share that unforgettable memory with their families and friends once they come home. Therefore, the indigenous culture is made accessible to the public without the support from the government, assisting this site to gain international fame. Both financial and technological support will flood in for the preservation of the unique nature and culture.
On the negative side, tourism can partly contribute to the loss of a country’s culture, especially the minority cultures. Foods, festivals, costumes and other stimulating elements are highlighted to entertain tourists, putting an insult to the inhabitants and may damage the unique nature there. Moreover, the cultural commercialization may insult the sacred elements of a reputable culture and tourists therefore are ill-informed to respect a long-standing culture, which cannot be found anywhere.
In the light of these facts, tourism constitutes a part in the preservation of a country for its unique culture and the government should also consider launching such maintenance campaigns to conserve a respectable tradition. But tourism unarguably is responsible for partly putting a cultural integrity at risk.
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial support To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that culture would be ruined if it is used to earn tourism revenue but others consider that tourism is the only hope to protect a culture Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Write an essay discussing two of the facilitie which facility should be given money from the local authority in your notes You should explain which facility it is more important for local authorities to give money to giving reasons in support of your answ 87
- Some people argue that mobile phones should be banned in public while other believe that the use of mobile phones is the basic rights of a human Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 286, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'promoted'.
Suggestion: promoted
...any tourism sites have enthusiastically promote their cultural heritages to the world t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2148.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65263157895 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21526828406 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534210526316 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8451578245 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.352941176 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277537513073 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950499603923 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462806880061 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160334709115 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356116208557 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.