Some people believe that environmental problems can be solved by increasing the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Recently, mankind has been faced with a lot of environmental challenges, such as air pollution, resulting from the use of cars and vehicles. While certain group of individuals are of the opinion that by hiking the cost of petrol could mitigate this environmental pollution, I completely disagree with these school of thoughts. In my opinion, these issues could be alleviated by the construction of railways and introduction of electronic Trains.
Increasing number of cars and vehicles plying the major road, had been noted to cause air pollution. This result from the combustion of fossil fuel which contaminate the atmosphere causing environmental issues. Some people opined that, if the prince of fuel used by cars and vehicle is increased, it will reduce the number of motorable machine. Thus, solving the environmental menace. For instance, in Japan, when the pump price of fuel was increased in 2016, there was a remarkable reduction in the number of cars on the metropolitan area, and also a decreased in gas emission. Hence, by increasing the cost of petroleum, the issues of polluting the environment were solved.
Furthermore, environmental problem could also be alleviated by the construction of railways and provision of electronic trains. This will ultimately reduce the usage and dependent on cars and vehicle for transportation. People could travel by this means. To illustrate, recently, it was published on the national Newspaper, that since people started to patronise the ultra modern train station conveying passages from Abuja to Kaduna, there has been a reduction in the use of vehicles from the destination, as people now enjoy travelling by train. This has lead to curtail the emissions from using cars and vehicles plying the road and has therefore, reduced emission from them.
In conclusion, although environmental challenges arising from the use of cars and vehicles could be solved by increasing the cost of petroleum used by these automobiles, there are others ways like, building train station and use of train as a means of transportation, will help mitigate these issues.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your 73
- School and university students learn lesson far better from their teachers than from other source, such as internet and television. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 78
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than to live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree 84
- In order to study at university students are required to pay expensive tuition fees. Not all students can afford them so some people think that university education should be free for everyone. To what extent do you agree? 67
- Task2 questionSmoking tobacco is becoming increasingly popular among young people with potentially serious effects on their health. Explain some reasons for this problem and suggest some possible solution. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause air pollution. This result from the combustion of fossil fuel which contamin...
^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st of petroleum, the issues of polluting the environment were solved. Furtherm...
^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns of transportation, will help mitigate these issues.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31044776119 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05215085813 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501492537313 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.3152444358 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229254433466 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807972104597 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337615834747 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14071551501 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426367525139 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.