Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
The improving quality of education has entailed a rise in the demand for free access to tertiary study. Yet, it is deemed the government obligation to sponsor this program for learners, regardless of their socioeconomic status. Objectively, I firmly concur with this notion on the grounds that this action promotes social equality and thus, lessens the financial burden for families.
For one thing, the principally targeted beneficiaries of this policy must be the disadvantaged, whose exposure to education is limited due to financial predicaments. By virtue of this, once the opportunity to progress further on their studies is offered, it would be a substantial support from the authorities to this group. In other words, the concept of equality is vicariously refined through this action as students similarly receive the formal teaching program from the university. Admittedly, financial discrimination is indeed a contentious issue that requires additional attention to be resolved, countries who take this step are irrefutably active in addressing this drawback within a firm.
For another, in the context of family, financial aid from the official administration allows those with poor financial background to bear a reduced tuition fee, which has readily been a stressful issue since the living costs surged. The stark reality is that many families are initially incapable of affording their basic requirements owing to their low income, not to mention the expenditure for their progeny’s studies. As a result, open policy in education acts as a savior for these students’ ambitions as well as reducing the pressure for parents in terms of their financial capability.
To conclude, the suggestion that free tertiary education should be implemented by governments is undoubtedly ethical. From an objective angle, I agree with this view for the aforementioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-01 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | Kiwi | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | dieulinhxinhgai | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | dieulinhxinhgai | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | dieulinhxinhgai | 61 | view |
- Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as companions and workers to help at work and at home Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Some people think the main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and workers rather than to benefit them as individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some are of the opinion that people are naturally born as good leaders while others feel that leadership skills can be learned Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success Others argue that happiness depends on different factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, so, thus, well, as a result, as well as, for one thing, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53287197232 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10945045432 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615916955017 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5724872032 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.25 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135159979798 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577542745119 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397208816325 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942524307586 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312386717297 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.