Some people believe that the government must ban dangerous sports such as boxing or motor-racing, others believe people must have the right to play these sports.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In these latter days, people have freedom of choices to take part in their favorite sport activities regardless of their danger and challenge. Many people perceive that government should put an end to such sports with high level of risk with a view to protecting people from regretful accidents. However, others think that everyone has their own right to choose the games that bring them relaxation. The following paragraphs will discuss both views.
On the one hand, it is often stated that government has the authority to abolish citizen’s attendance in dangerous sports. It cannot be denied that those sports relating to adventure and risk have tendency to pose threat on people’s life by causing a dozen of deaths. In this case, government has to deal with a new burden known as a loss of human resource to proceed smooth operation of industrializing country. Besides that, such sports are prohibitively expensive even put a stagnation in multiple aspects of their life. The reason is that players have to spend a huge amount of money on fully equipping essential items for their preferable sport such as: motors, cars, boxing gloves, … More dangerously, it also creates players addiction leading them to spend unwisely and get into unexpected debts which make huge contribution to their distraction from work. As a result, their family life will turn into the darkness in the future.
Another side of this argument is that people have legitimate rights to join in risky sports. It is far from groundless that making decisions by themselves to play favorite activities brings people motivations to have high working productivity. Indeed, those sports easily become passion causing everyone not to resist temptation and be willing to put off all their working plans to give over all time to their hobby. Accordingly, if not be given a chance to play, they will gradually lose their interest in their job and daily life leading to life unsatisfaction. Furthermore, in the vanguard of modernization, people’s life seems to be more stressful with a variety of serious concerns easily empowering long-term pressure and exhaustion. Therefore, people need to take time for their leisure activities whether it is adventure or not to drive themselves out of their mundane world.
In conclusion, participating in hazardous sports indiscriminately brings both positive and negative side to people’s life. However, it will be better for everyone in all ages to restrict such an unsafe activity with a view to protecting themselves from unexpected risks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-21 | Ann Nguyen | 73 | view |
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives Which viewpoint do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 73
- Some people believe that the government must ban dangerous sports such as boxing or motor racing others believe people must have the right to play these sports Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives Which viewpoint do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 451, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing paragraphs will discuss both views. On the one hand, it is often stat...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rn into the darkness in the future. Another side of this argument is that pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mselves out of their mundane world. In conclusion, participating in hazardou...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21549636804 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88579225897 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55205811138 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2287157108 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9444444444 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22357256923 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753759661726 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482017881928 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156796435401 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630459362603 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 451, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing paragraphs will discuss both views. On the one hand, it is often stat...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rn into the darkness in the future. Another side of this argument is that pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mselves out of their mundane world. In conclusion, participating in hazardou...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21549636804 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88579225897 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55205811138 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2287157108 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9444444444 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22357256923 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753759661726 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482017881928 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156796435401 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630459362603 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.