Some people believe that Government should ban dangerous sports while others believe that it is an individual choice. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Some people believe that Government should ban dangerous sports while others believe that it is an individual choice. Do you agree or disagree?

In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that sports are gaining more popularity than the past. Some people concur that risky sports should be banned. I quibble from them and profound that sports are necessary in daily routine.

Adequate evidence are obtainable to substantiate the concept of sports. The top-notch concrete reason is sports keep our body fit and healthy. We can maintain our bodies fit without going to gym with sports. Another rationale which hauls me to patron is due to sports person can reduce his or her weight and get out of increased fat. Which makes one a healthy buzz. The rearmost coherent factor to be considered which can not be neglected is one can make career in this field. To exemplify, my sister is a good tennis player. She used to play tennis in her leisure time which is prima facie testimony.

Life is a coin, pleasure and pain are two sides. Only one side is visible at a time but remember other side is waiting for it's turn. So public in general tend to contend that there are many risks in dangerous sports. Players play games with their own lives risks. For example, according to a university survey, in Rishikesh, a well known hill station in India, many people lost their lives because of sky diving. So government banned this sport.

In recapitulation, I reiterate there are innumerable factors supporting advantages of sports are inevitable. However, it's contrary should be overlooked. Consequently, I disagree with the given statement.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-25 JvalPatel2407 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...er weight and get out of increased fat. Which makes one a healthy buzz. The rearmost ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 402, Rule ID: SKY_DIVING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'skydiving'?
Suggestion: skydiving
...many people lost their lives because of sky diving. So government banned this sport. ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, look, so, well, for example, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98814229249 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65130491233 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652173913043 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0972667609 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.1 106.682146367 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.65 20.7667163134 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126635898325 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382474663296 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544257994904 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827413720755 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415268358191 0.056905535591 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.0946893788 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 50.2224549098 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.77 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.