Nowadays, some countries still have disadvantaged people such as the homeless and unemployed. Therefore, the government should not raise funds for international aid. I partially agree with this view and my reasons will be explained below.
On the one hand, while the country is facing difficulties in economy and human resources, the government should prioritize supporting its own citizens over other countries. First of all, the authorities need to build factories and housing to create the jobs opportunity as well as support accommodation for citizens. In addition, state budget should be spent on erecting schools to improve the country’s citizens’ level. For instance, Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh donated 10 billion VND to underprivileged people to help sustain their lives. From my point of view, these solutions can be seen to reduce an unemployment rate and improve people’s living standard. It is obvious that a country can fully developed when each individual in the country gets higher living standard
On the other hand, the state budget should also be contributed to help other countries so as to strengthen solidarity and foster cross-border relationship. Moreover, it is an expression of benevolence, a symbolize human decency for other countries. The government can support the country which was attacked by the natuaral disasters such as flood, earthquake....by money or by human resources. Take the earthquake in Mexico in 2023 as an example, after the disaster the country recceived much assistance from other ones all over the world to rescue its people and overcome the difficulties.
In conclusion, So long as the disadvantaged, the homeless and the unemployed still remain in own country, a country should support its people instead of using money for international aids. This is a solution that supports the own country's development more and more.
- The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000 Summarize the formation by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Y 84
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 61
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 253, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'jobs'' or 'job's'?
Suggestion: jobs'; job's
...ild factories and housing to create the jobs opportunity as well as support accommod...
^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udget should also be contributed to help other countries so as to strengthen soli...
^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...be contributed to help other countries so as to strengthen solidarity and foster cross-...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...er, it is an expression of benevolence, a symbolize human decency for other countries. The ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39661016949 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11297199742 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596610169492 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1227294872 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4285714286 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198145546525 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745505228526 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707485122657 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146425949509 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726492354228 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 253, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'jobs'' or 'job's'?
Suggestion: jobs'; job's
...ild factories and housing to create the jobs opportunity as well as support accommod...
^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udget should also be contributed to help other countries so as to strengthen soli...
^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...be contributed to help other countries so as to strengthen solidarity and foster cross-...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...er, it is an expression of benevolence, a symbolize human decency for other countries. The ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39661016949 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11297199742 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596610169492 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1227294872 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4285714286 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198145546525 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745505228526 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707485122657 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146425949509 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726492354228 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.