Some people believe that the government should pay for and offer housing to people who lost their homes or cannot afford them. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion. Use specific reasons and examples to support it.
Whether the government should support people who lost their homes ,offering them housing, is one of the issues widely discussed around the world. Some feel it is the government’s duty, while others disagree. In my opinion, the first approach is more beneficial both for individuals and society.
It is true that supporting people who have lost their homes might seem like a heavy burden for taxpayers. The main argument is society cannot afford it, taking into consideration other numerous problems like crime level, unemployment, environment protection and the like. Does it mean we should turn away from people who survived after disasters? –Of course, not. Earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and avalanches bring horrible damages to people’s properties, leaving hundreds of victims behind.
However, if people have stayed virtually in the street with no place to live in, undoubtedly they cannot be ignored. If they are not given any support, they can easily get furious and be involved into crimes. As a result, crime rates will ascend dramatically. It is clear that all cases of loosing property have to be thoroughly investigated. For example, if a man was drunk and set up a fire at home, he has to take responsibilities for his actions. But still he deserves to be given a tiny room in housing commission somewhere in the outskirts. Moreover, there are natural catastrophies, like the flood happened in north Queensland last month. Needless to say that without the government’s support people cannot overcome such disasters. They have gone through enough hardship, hence they need to be shown our compassion, and not only in words, but in deeds as well. Another reason is a moral example for our children. We all treasure Christian values, which teach us to be generous to those who are in need. Of course, without the world’s collaboration, the Red Cross activity and numerous voluntary organisations, a lot of developing countries like Ghana, Angola and others, would never be able to overcome the terrible consequences of natural disasters.
In conclusion, people who lost their homes cannot be left alone and should be given support from the government.
- Are quick decisions always wrong Give your opinion 80
- Museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists, not the local people. Why is it so? What could be done to encourage more local visitors? Please include relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. 85
- 30 Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 80
- It is important to ensure that children with a wide range of abilities and from a variety of social backgrounds mix with each other at school To what extend do you agree or disagree 93
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 50
The main argument is society cannot afford it
The main argument is that society cannot afford it
Sentence: Moreover, there are natural catastrophies, like the flood happened in north Queensland last month.
Error: catastrophies Suggestion: catastrophes
flaws:
The following content should be put into the third paragraph:
'Does it mean we should turn away from people who survived after disasters? –Of course, not. Earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and avalanches bring horrible damages to people’s properties, leaving hundreds of victims behind.'
Attribute Value Ideal
Score:7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 351 350
No. of Characters: 1758 1500
No. of Different Words: 220 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.328 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.009 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.755 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 127 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 92 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 65 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.804 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.619 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.265 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.412 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.057 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5