Language is a key part for not only communication but also for our culture. Some people believe that it is not necessary to waste money on dying languages, while others argue that governments have the responsibility to conserve the endangered ones. In my opinion, the former one deserves to be advocated.
Some may defend the necessity to prevent the old languages from extinction by indicating that they represent the culture and are essential factor for a civilization. History, literature or the building ways for great landmarks which are mostly written or recorded in the old language can be lost once their language dies out. As a prime example, the extinction of old Egyptian language leads to the mystery of the construction of pyramid and this great symbol of ancient civilization still baffles scholars who study ancient breakthroughs for academic research.
However, some languages are hard to speak, which add evidence for the irretrievable death of these ancient ones. Compared with the those which are prevalent in this modern society, these endangered languages are not simplified and improved by people as the time passes by, making them extremely complicated and not worthy to be conserved. Especially in current world where international language gradually becomes the main trend because of globalization, it is easy for the public to abandon those language which are difficult for people to master in work places.
Additionally, it is tough to reverse the decline of minor languages because their revitalization requires much more efforts than the public can expect. Hebrew, once extincted yet currently revived, can be the best example to illustrate this point. From the start of its revival initiated in 19th century to the time when its status as a massively used language finally won international recognition in 20th century, Jews spent decades to promote their campaign. Besides the time needed, the huge Jewish population is another factor for the final success. However, this can not be replicated for other endangered language which is only used by minorities.
In conclusion, the reversion of extincting languages by governmental efforts is unnecessary. Although protecting extinct languages bring benefits for culture-related researches, their difficulties for speaking and revitalization make this goal tough to achieve in the reality.
- High school teachers spend most of the class time lecturing while the students listen and take notes. Other high school teachers spend most of the class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involved in and exchange their ideas. Which i 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Transnational marriage has brought more benefits than drawbacks. Do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this language' or 'those languages'?
Suggestion: this language; those languages
...n, it is easy for the public to abandon those language which are difficult for people to maste...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, while, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26356589147 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90061318993 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3057458575 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.8 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179718778548 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074813367345 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537477050023 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107595155874 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589847350025 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.