Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
What is supposed to be the crucial element that serves as a catalyst of citizens' living quality? The answer lies in those essential factors that is closely related to our daily life such as public transportation and Internet. Compared with improving public transportation system which can only free people from traffic congestion, better access to the Internet can generate more benefits. Personally, I embrace the viewpoint that it is of greater importance for the government to make Internet available to everyone.
To begin with, Internet should be regarded as the priority for governmental funding for the important role it plays for the national economy. That is to say, when the role of Internet in promoting the development of companies is widely acknowledged, clear decisions should be made by all the countries to place more emphasis on such area. For instance, online conference, on the one hand, has significantly improved the working efficiency for international enterprises and reduce the daily expense because staff do not have to be away on business trips. On the other hand, Internet offer manufacturers a better platform to present their products and find potential consumers. Hence, more investment is of great need.
Additionally, it should be acknowledged that better access to Internet can also exert a positive influence on individuals. With the information dissemination accelerated by Internet technology, people can search for whatever they want as long as they have a smart phone linked to the Internet. While books were regarded as the best tools to acquire knowledge by my parents twenty years ago, it becomes currently a common occurrence for my 7-year-old cousin to study English and Chinese history by taking online courses. Therefore, when Internet is available for everyone, more chances of education have been provided to the society.
Nonetheless, voices can be heard that we can not ignore the significance of public transportation because admittedly, funding the construction of it will be beneficial to some extent. For example, traffic congestion might be resolved and daily life could be more convenient with broader roads and more routes of subway, which, however, does not equal that better Internet is of less necessity since the Internet generates much more advantages in a wider range of aspects.
Consequently, in order to ensure the living quality of people, it is better Internet access that should be emphasized by the government. After all, in this networked era, people who can surf on the Internet literally have the world at their fingertips.
- Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- Transnational marriage has brought more benefits than drawbacks. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The government should spend money in promoting sport and art in school rather than sponsoring professional sports and art events in communities To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, after all, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2192.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32038834951 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9898893312 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56067961165 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7316233464 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.941176471 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2352941176 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205718917769 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694165827453 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460573637781 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120710574676 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498459670755 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.