Some people believe that international free-car days are effective ways to reduce the air pollution. However, the others argue that there are several ways that are more effective. Discuss both views & give your own opinion
Nowadays, there is an annual period when motorists and commuters pave the way for transportation without cars. While these international car-free days are believed to lessen air pollution in the locality, more people favor other effective methods to eliminate air pollution. This essay will discuss two different points of view and favor the latter.
For several reasons, a few people consider holding car-free day events as a sole-effective solution to limit air pollutants from petrol-driven vehicles. Firstly, a few cars running on the local streets might temporarily reduce the level of exhaust fumes from these vehicles during this period. In fact, if no cars are on the road, there would be more fresh air, benefitting pedestrians on the pavement. Secondly, these events remind drivers to preserve the environment and motivate them to do more physical activities. Whenever no cars are permitted on transportation, drivers might gain more chances for cycling or walking.
On the other hand, car-free days are prone to have little effect on lowering the level of exhaust fumes from petrol-driven vehicles; thus, there is more space for greener alternatives to fuel-powered cars. During the technology era, governments should encourage transporting by electric vehicles since no automobiles using battery charge release fumes into the surrounding areas. When electric cars are permitted on the road, there is none the level of air pollutants from these automobiles.
In conclusion, there are few effects of car-free day events on reducing car exhaust fumes, especially during a new wave of electric cars in the automobile industry. Thus, the existence of car-free days is less vital than other alternatives, such as electric cars, rather than petrol or diesel-powered vehicles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-02 | Dinh Ngoc Thao Nguyen | 78 | view |
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Is this a negative or positive development 84
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people believe that international free car days are effective ways to reduce the air pollution However the others argue that there are several ways that are more effective Discuss both views give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49275362319 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98430220509 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.335793941 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.615384615 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309232905118 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10856089575 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926239800224 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199822417401 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663280407313 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.