Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your won knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words
In this competitive world, people are not satisfied with their job and often have to compromise on financial aspects to meet the standard of living. Instead of feeling worse about the situation, one must work hard to improve their conditions, whereas, on the other hand, some believe that they must accept the crises and go with the flow. I agree with working arduously to make situations better instead of compromising.
The main reason why people accept bad situations is because of their lack of self-confidence. If the action is not taking at the right moment to look for good opportunities in the self-motivating career options, regret will bound in the later stage of life. People stick with the job as they do not want to take any risk or prefer staying in their comfort zone, but they forget that it will affect mentally in the coming future. This will further cause a destressing situation and regret later in life for not taking action at the right time, making the situation worse.
However, some people believe in taking desired actions instead of staying satisfied with the professional and monetary conditions. The situations can be improved by developing their skill sets or taking a calculated risk to avoid detrimental effects in their life. These days, students look for abroad opportunities to upscale their knowledge, provide a significant contribution to the world, instead of staying in the bubble. Such actions are risk taking, but when worked hard the life will be settled and mentally peaceful as well. Despite the fact, the outcomes are rewarding and satisfying without any regrets.
In conclusion, instead of complaining and accepting life situations, the appropriate actions will brighten the future. Thus, little action with self-confidence can bring about significant changes in the standard of living
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-04 | parabshreyas | 73 | view |
- Prevention is better than cure Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures To what extent do you agree 84
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and inc 89
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 92
- All over the world the rich are becoming richer and the poor are becoming poorer What problems does this cause How can we overcome the problems of poverty Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and inclu 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, thus, well, whereas, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19865319865 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83173590712 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1201430787 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141464621501 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534475070685 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432321168228 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831572047996 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410363369553 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, thus, well, whereas, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19865319865 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83173590712 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1201430787 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141464621501 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534475070685 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432321168228 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831572047996 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410363369553 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.