Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely.Discuss both views and five yo

Knowledge increases when it is shared, that's why some people think that sharing information about scientific research must be free of charge. On the other hand, some people believe that some knowledge is very confidential and important to be shared without getting money. In my opinion, both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages. Both sides will be analyzed in this essay before drawing opinion and logical conclusion.

We live in an age where new inventions happen almost every day. Some of these inventions can not be done without having sufficient funds. That causes them to halt their progress. In order to cope with these problem, scientists want to sell their important knowledge to other scientists because they are working hard to get these knowledge and it is not logical to give these informations without receiving a recompense for their work. On the other hand, by sharing information freely, it can be fallen into wrong hands and it can lead to wars and terrorist activity.

Conversely, sharing information freely is vital because it helps to keep us updated with the inventions happening around us. When cures of diseaster are found, it must be shared without taking consideration money because it is more important than money. Nowadays, many inventions are open source and knowledge are shared freely because they think that it is their duties to the world.

In conclusion, distributing information free of charge can help in certain aspects but can also be detrimental to society. My opinion is that knowledge must not be shared without charge.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
Knowledge increases when it is shared, thats why some people think that sharing info...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
...t their progress. In order to cope with these problem, scientists want to sell their importan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'these knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; these knowledges
...ts because they are working hard to get these knowledge and it is not logical to give these inf...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, so, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1875 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75917326556 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55078125 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0747751151 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8571428571 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264596915536 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935948398262 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084095784293 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168704828413 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865917389556 0.056905535591 152% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.