Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is certainly true that, findings of innovative works should be disseminate in the world environment. It is often that, it is positive development, whilst other disagree and think that person should paid to the valuable findings and the information. This essay agrees that, passing the significant knowledge comes out from multiple grate work like research, business and the teaching may help to enhance individual motivations on good work for their better future. The essay will discuss both point of view.
With regards to the positive concern, multiple knowledge from any kind of novel work would be the source of inspirational to everybody in regards to pursue their career in grate work. It allow individual and people to keep focusing on such a milestone work to be a successful person in the future, and it is quite confidence to everyone imitate all the valuable process which leads to the success. It is therefore agreed that, great information of good work always helps to avoid general concept on particular topic and clear the idea for future success. For example, a recent study of 2018 conducted by “Sociology Department” of Tribhuwan University found that, student who follow the success stories of great work will have less confusion to fulfill their goal in their future endeavor.
However, many disagree and feel that, people should pay good amount for such a great discovery or knowledge. Such knowledge is no longer general, need hues investment and quite longer period of time to make it in real prospective and then in world wide. In certain case, relation of such innovative work may have with very lower number and the cost which is invested to this work would not pay back to the initiator. Despite this, easy access of valuable knowledge will help to inspire the maximum numbers of people in the world to change their career differently and this essay clearly disagree on the view of payment for receiving such a good information. For instance, this is most evident in my country that, all the scholar are happy to disseminate their findings as free to the public.
In conclusion, while access with knowledge related to great work would be significant to positively driven the individual motivations to shape out their future career, some people still believe that people should paid good amount for valuable knowledge. However, I personally think that, easy access of knowledge related to multiple work would be more sustainable way to motivate people and mobilize them for good purpose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-22 | dilipkarki | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007. 73
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 73
- It is thought by some that it is better to live in a city while others believe that life is better in the countryside. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 67
- Some people say that holding sport competitions cause many problems, others disagree about this statement. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are those problems?Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'disseminated'?
Suggestion: disseminated
... findings of innovative works should be disseminate in the world environment. It is often t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...he source of inspirational to everybody in regards to pursue their career in grate work. It a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'allows'?
Suggestion: allows
...o pursue their career in grate work. It allow individual and people to keep focusing ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
..., need hues investment and quite longer period of time to make it in real prospective and then...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...make it in real prospective and then in world wide. In certain case, relation of such inno...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...make it in real prospective and then in world wide. In certain case, relation of such inno...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely driven the individual motivations to shape out their future career, some peop...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 416.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08653846154 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70688020492 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490384615385 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.972117937 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.066666667 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7333333333 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119227979327 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487146101154 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402441115534 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840026420667 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032444330292 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.