Although it is considered that scientific studies, business information, and academic information should be spread as widely as possible, others argue that some knowledge is too crucial to be shared without payment. In my opinion, valuable information should be kept by the owner rather than being accessed freely.
On the one hand, many people believe that sharing knowledge in science or business will result in greater benefits. Many organizations in different countries can easily access this kind of information, which helps them cope with global issues. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccination formulas have been published by the authors that every country can produce and provide to their citizens to prevent the spreading of the disease and reduce the medical burden.
However, I believe that some information should only be shared if it is equivalently exchanged. Scientific research, business knowledge, and academic knowledge is results of long-period studies and many efforts, which makes them priceless intellectual property. Sharing this kind of information can lead to financial disadvantages for the authors. For example, after the design of Apple's camera was leaked, rivals Samsung and Huawei reaped the benefits by releasing their products sooner and attracting more customers. Apple's leakage accident also lowered buyers' expectations for the latest iPhone series and reduced their estimated sales profits. Thus, priceless information should be secured to safeguard the owner's rights.
In conclusion, while a group of people think that it is a good idea to share widely information in science, business or academic area, I strongly believe that these should only be accessed with an equal payment.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 84
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information 78
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world 84
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess knowledge, and academic knowledge is results of long-period studies and many ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58712121212 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82501361155 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617424242424 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6362813878 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.916666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347842941925 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125866870661 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117156892507 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212452735888 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900942481452 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.