Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In this digital age, it is effortless for individuals to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and academic graphs. However, other people do not reckon that searching for these information freely is not ideal because these data are too valuable to access. From my perspective, I conceive that these views have both upsides and downsides.
On the one hand, the more information we extend, the more knowledge we get. To be more specific, human beings can be involved in many graphs of many fields if these information are already published. For instance, most families usually read the news or watch TV in the morning as a ritual, which is useful for them to immerse themselves in totally orthodox information. Moreover, some individuals have to search for different fields of data to accomplish their tasks. University students are reachable to necessary knowledge for their academic scientific research. If more data is public, they will accomplish their academic studies faster.
On the other hand, some information is too valuable to access freely as it is. Admittedly, in most fields, scientists spend much effort applying themselves to research. It is attributed to that a lot of sources of materials are filed for the patent. The masses are obtainable to websites that contain so much available particular data, but they are just fundamental and common to use. Besides that, private data such as name, age, address, and the like, should be restricted. People sometimes get stuck in trouble because they share their private things or details in public. Criminals utilize these information and do something unsafe and immoral.
In my point of view, I totally reckon that humans can take advantage of available data for their own reasons, especially knowledge related to academic specialization. Nevertheless, personal information should be confidential for safety.
To sum up, sharing information freely allows people to be in a win-win situation, but they had better be aware of what kind of data they can publish and vice versa.
be aware of what kind of data which they can publish and vice versa.
- Nowadays it is possible to move ocean creatures from their natural habitats at sea and have them relocated in amusement parks for the purpose of people s recreation Do you think the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages Explain your reasons and suppor 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 73
- Without capital punishment the dealth penalty our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society To what extent do you do agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can government do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...people do not reckon that searching for these information freely is not ideal because these data ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...volved in many graphs of many fields if these information are already published. For instance, mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...or details in public. Criminals utilize these information and do something unsafe and immoral. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f data they can publish and vice versa. be aware of what kind of data which they...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Be
...ata they can publish and vice versa. be aware of what kind of data which they c...
^^
Line 10, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which they can publish and vice versa.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, for instance, kind of, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20461095101 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.843418166 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527377521614 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4184180345 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.35 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261915402854 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812949404367 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806708967641 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137404595541 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821142520693 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...people do not reckon that searching for these information freely is not ideal because these data ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...volved in many graphs of many fields if these information are already published. For instance, mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...or details in public. Criminals utilize these information and do something unsafe and immoral. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f data they can publish and vice versa. be aware of what kind of data which they...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Be
...ata they can publish and vice versa. be aware of what kind of data which they c...
^^
Line 10, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which they can publish and vice versa.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, for instance, kind of, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20461095101 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.843418166 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527377521614 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4184180345 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.35 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261915402854 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812949404367 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806708967641 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137404595541 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821142520693 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.