Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi

Essay topics:

Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

These days, information has base and critical role around the world. Data get hard and full-time working scientist, experts and businessmen. Now the important question is sharing information free good or not? The following essay takes a look at both sides of the argument that some people think data should be available and others disagree with them and say it's irrational.

To begin with, the data are the infrastructure of science, business and society. In some cases, it's very important to have free and easy access to information to make the world better place. Obviously, data are critical as they form the basis of good scientific initiative, wise management and use of resources and informed decision-making. For example, in the health area, data sharing can help to that country don't have advanced laboratory or enough money for research. Not only the free access to information can save a lot of human lives in the world, but also sometimes it paves the way for new discoveries and inventions.

On the other hand, some people believe that must not scientific results, business and the academic world information freely disseminated because doing so might pose risks to commercial interests, national security, human health or other objectives. For instance, if the nuclear technology's data shared by all nations around the world, the most countries may use these data to produce energy or drugs, on the contrary, some nations or terrorist groups might use them as biological weapons and atomic bombs. To summarize some data can be a risk for humans.

My opinion is that we can classify the database on this phrase and then share information in public: these data can help people, environment, creatures and save their lives and security or not.

As a result, data have limited value, when they archive or just a few people can use them. For the global progress and extending knowledge from prior consequence, restriction on valuable data should debar.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-24 benj212 61 view
2020-01-13 Mouaz1994 78 view
2020-01-09 mirolinquency 73 view
2020-01-08 wondertran 89 view
2019-12-28 Asma Shahin 84 view
Essays by user zahra70 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gree with them and say its irrational. To begin with, the data are the infrastr...
^^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
..., data sharing can help to that country dont have advanced laboratory or enough mone...
^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these data can help people, environment, creatures and save their lives and secur...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, then, for example, for instance, as a result, in some cases, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11455108359 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75517096329 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6363756579 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.133333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279337056076 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953721411612 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693146002623 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148966200388 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792814155513 0.056905535591 139% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.