Some people believe murders should be sent to death sentences, but others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Granted that the death punishment for murderers is effective to reduce the cases of mortality, but giving those people deserves a chance with sending to the community, changing their-self.
The popular assumption that death penalty is the best option for murders, and it implies to break the chain of cases. This is to say, those murderers decide to repeat from criminal activities, and this transpires in a short time, while some of them often make the same mistake in the future. For example, In Colombia, if Pablo Escobar groups kill their enemies from cartel Cali, having around 100 cases of people died, they often escape from Colombia to avoid the case, and police of Colombia shoot him with a gun, and it is successful to reduce the number of people die around 5% . However, those murders have a chance to change themselves.
That said, committing death penalty for murderers can be changed by sending executants to the community authorities, making a compensation with supervision. Community having policy will shape murderers' behaviour, altering habit and paradigm, and those murders are used to conduct social activities. Community policy in England imposes a hundred murderers to join social training before they go to community services with the police control, encouraging them to change their attitude to communicate in society, and they clean roads in England on Sundays as behaviour forming. Hence, if there are murderers realizing their mistakes through public services, those will be accepted by societies without consideration.
To conclude, the capital punishment is valuable for punishing murderers as that sentence can break the chain of cases, while it is believed that sending to the societies policy is to help realizing murderers. Where possible, it is suggested that the valuable form of punishment should be considered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-27 | sunflower1190 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Trandinhphuc8.0 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Kha Linh | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | steveminh | 89 | view |
- the diagram shows about the visual appearant motion 71
- Online Shopping is increasing significantly What are the effects on the environment and the type of jobs that require 67
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- The criminal record in Cape town 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...educe the number of people die around 5% . However, those murders have a chance to...
^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'societies'' or 'society's'?
Suggestion: societies'; society's
...hile it is believed that sending to the societies policy is to help realizing murderers. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to realize' or 'realize'.
Suggestion: to realize; realize
...ding to the societies policy is to help realizing murderers. Where possible, it is sugges...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31292517007 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76168224549 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.0228449715 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158979163778 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065544215955 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293509628235 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102044775263 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174375519094 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.