Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

It is commonly thought that there are plenty of options for us at the present. I strongly agree with this view because production and consumption are extremely fast in these days.

Firstly, population of world is increasing all the time and number of people is meaning to number of different choices. In the other words, every person represent an individual style and selection although they all seem like the same. So, production and creation of modern materials are diversifying on a daily basis because of this differentation. Thus, we have a large number of choices about everything such as fashion, foods, car models, furniture types even though courses and schools. Also, we have many different job opportunities which are related to several type of area and it is quite confusing for people.

Secondly, people are more tending to boredom nowadays due to the insane consumption of modern individuals. Therefore, they want to do, watch, read or listen different things in any other day. Hence, brands and companies are trying to find out new trends and innovations for millennium generation who desire unusual and extraordinary stuff. In my opinion, having too many options is making it difficult to choice and we could not know what we want and why we want. We are just thinking the need to buy something and we should make choice even though we do not require anything.

In conclude, many people thought the number of choices are so much today. In my opinion, I completely agree with this and we have as many preferences as we want.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb mean is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'means'
Suggestion: means
...asing all the time and number of people is meaning to number of different choices. In the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...asing all the time and number of people is meaning to number of different choices. In the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...resent an individual style and selection although they all seem like the same. So...
^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e of this differentation. Thus, we have a large number of choices about everything such as fashio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ough courses and schools. Also, we have many different job opportunities which are related to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun type seems to be countable; consider using: 'several types'.
Suggestion: several types
... job opportunities which are related to several type of area and it is quite confusing for p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94636015326 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73460706079 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613026819923 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.6625323109 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.2142857143 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305842270931 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935717053805 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086423283004 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187301599489 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924561447567 0.056905535591 162% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.