People living in today's society are filled with abundant choices. While there are certain downsides of overchoice, I would contend that the benefits do outweigh the drawbacks.
There are numerous reasons why people might disapprove of choice overload. The first objection is that a wide range of choices acts as a deterrent to decision-making. People are inundated with choices, which causes them to be stressed when making ultimate decisions. Should they have abundant choices, they will overwhelm disorientation in their plans or goals and not focus on the main purpose of the issues. Another justification is that people might be filled with remorse after making final decisions. Individuals who do not consider their decision carefully, thereby being regretted as the choices not suitable for their potential. Decision-making fatigue is a major contributor to procrastination and rattling, which cause the brain to rattle.
In spite of the downsides mentioned above, I believe that a colossal cornucopia of choices is a positive approach. First and foremost, people would burgeon brilliant opportunities to acquire knowledge and experience in a rich variety of fields. This would therefore boost their confidence and determination and prevent them from being overwhelmed or anxious. It should also be noted that profusion of choice would encourage competition among themselves. Abundance might act as a support for making final decisions as people could indicate the beneficial impacts or detrimental effects of a wealth of information about their choices. People appointing the advantages and disadvantages of innumerable options, which would in turn not distress themselves and make choices wisely.
In sum, it seems to me that the merits of option overload eclipse the demerits.
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the united kingdom sweden italy and portugal between 1967 and 2007 84
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he benefits do outweigh the drawbacks. There are numerous reasons why people mi...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ling, which cause the brain to rattle. In spite of the downsides mentioned abov...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss themselves and make choices wisely. In sum, it seems to me that the merits o...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... option overload eclipse the demerits.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59706959707 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07416586738 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59706959707 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2510370385 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145094696882 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490094952699 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284002347976 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771933841639 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454095537983 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.