Contemporary society depends on instant news from around the world as well as local news. While some believe that TV news are better way how to delivery them, I, however, believe that radio news have more merits.
On the one hand, it could be argued that TV news can report a story with pictures. Live stream can in many situations give a clearer picture of a situation. As far as human imagination as well as understanding is limited by individual, picturing of a news is in vast of cases the simplest way of understanding. Moreover, if news are presented in foreign language, people can still get an essential informations from pictures. Secondly, news presented on TV can deliver more informations at one time. Take CNN for example. Since its established, CNN not only stream picturing news, but also includes written reports at the bottom of the screen. As a result, spectators can watch as well as read more news at one time.
However, from the other hand, in my opinion, I believe that radio has fairly more benefits than TV. Radio has been turned into the smallest and simplest gadgets and its available instantly almost everywhere. With wireless streaming, the most primitive gadget is able to catch a signal. With wider range of signal, listeners are able to listen in mountains as well as in the forest. However, the best benefit of news delivered by radio is their instant delivery. Presenter does not have to wait for camera to record a news. The presenter is able, anytime, simply read a message into the stream and widespread within members of the public. In case of tsunami, for example, radio station can warn people directly, without any delay.
In short, although TV news might make reports more clear, owning to they delivery as a pictures. Therefore, on balance, I believe that radio news have more merits.
- Topic: When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Today, more and more students are deciding to move to a different country for higher studies. Do you think that the benefits of this outweigh the problems ? 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 61
- The illustrations below show how coffee is sometimes produce. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
... is limited by individual, picturing of a news is in vast of cases the simplest way of...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'information'?
Suggestion: information
...uage, people can still get an essential informations from pictures. Secondly, news presented...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...s not have to wait for camera to record a news. The presenter is able, anytime, simply...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a picture' or simply 'pictures'?
Suggestion: a picture; pictures
... more clear, owning to they delivery as a pictures. Therefore, on balance, I believe that ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in short, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84713375796 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63642722431 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550955414013 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4145946532 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.1 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274680623809 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816656089335 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851619699751 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184451357249 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721391625407 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.