Some people believe that technology has made man more social. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is believed that technology is one of the well-known forms of socializing, but it’s still argued whether it increases ones’ self esteem to be more social or not. I personally think that it depends on the view, some said that it encourages them to socialize more, but there are also some that said the opposite. In this essay, my agreement and disagreement toward this topic will be critically described.
On the one hand, technologies will surely bring more comforts for people to communicate with others, although the distance is far apart. Such applications as Line, Facebook, and Instagram are the pioneers in terms of encouraging the society to share their favorite things with strangers; they are mostly filled with groups made by the users for their daily sharing activities. Moreover, searching those organizations on the social media is not that difficult, we only need to type some keywords and groups related to that keywords will be shown, and there are no specific requirements to join.
On the other hand, the quality of a relation made by the assistance of sophisticated technologies are less likely to be acknowledged a serious one. Relation quantities increases for sure, but the quality is still a big conundrum since connections within the application are less likely to develop. People often take that as a mere hobby-related friendship that doesn’t have any effects on their life, and sometimes they’ll ignore anything happened to their internet-friend.
To conclude, technology have been proven to make humans more social, but the quality of their relations are still arguable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-27 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
- Crime is a big problem in the world many believe that nothing can be done to prevent it To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your own opinion 67
- Do copyright laws limit creativity or reward it Would society function better without such rules and regulations 36
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22692307692 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96291426584 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.9928042466 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.9 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204180796447 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787372815989 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434543094107 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122577598629 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524466684325 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.