Some people believe that teenagers should always follow the examples of older people and some believe it is natural in teenagers to challenge what old people say. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some individuals hold the opinion that teenagers should follow the advice of their parents, whereas others assert that it is acceptable if children want their own voice heard and question what their elders say. In this essay I shall discuss both perspectives. I, however, side with the latter view.
On the one hand, those who say that teenagers should follow the advice of their elders without questioning, give their reasons as follows. Firstly, they say that elders have a lot more experience than their teenage children. They have faced similar problems, so know what would be the right thing to do. Moreover, the elders know the temperament of their children and so can advice them very well in the crucial decisions of their life.
On the other hand, there are many reasons given by those who think that teens should not be forced to do what their elders say, and should have a right to challenge them. Firstly, the teens of today have more knowledge about their lives, needs and concerns, as they belong to a global village. They know what is happening even in the remotest corners of the planet Earth. They want to explore newer things and opportunities, and want to walk on the un-trodden path. But, the elderly force their decisions on them, which stifles their personality.
I believe that teens should be heard and their points given enough weightage. If parents think that their children are on the wrong path, then they should talk their children out of that, and not just force them to stop doing something. If parents learn to see the perspective of their teenage children and advise accordingly, they will get obedience and respect from their children. Otherwise, they may see their teens turn into rebels.
To sum up, teenagers should have the right to challenge what their elders say, and should not blindly follow their elders. At the same time, the elders too have to see that they treat their teenage children like friends and not force their ideas on them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-09 | vishal sachdeva | 56 | view |
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor Others think it has an opposite effect Discuss both views and give opinions 89
- The supporters of genetic research claim that genetic engineering is the answer to many problems and it should be conducted and results should be rigorously applied Is it true that genetic research has more benefits compared to drawbacks 73
- There is an increasing number of people using the credit card which seems likely to replace the coins and notes in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give opinions. 73
- Discuss your opinion on how modernism can affect our health What can the government do to overcome such situations 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 375, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'advise' (a verb)?
Suggestion: advise
...emperament of their children and so can advice them very well in the crucial decisions...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to have'?
Suggestion: to have
...ir elders. At the same time, the elders too have to see that they treat their teenage ch...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, whereas, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84117647059 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30342005388 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502941176471 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0080925508 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4444444444 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131782980336 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547933318244 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548269427583 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10155327463 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050470394644 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 375, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'advise' (a verb)?
Suggestion: advise
...emperament of their children and so can advice them very well in the crucial decisions...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to have'?
Suggestion: to have
...ir elders. At the same time, the elders too have to see that they treat their teenage ch...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, whereas, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84117647059 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30342005388 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502941176471 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0080925508 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4444444444 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131782980336 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547933318244 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548269427583 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10155327463 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050470394644 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.