Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time . This can beneficial for teenagers and the community as well. Do you agree or disagree.
Working for the society is a good things for our community. Many types of ngo are helpful to our society and many teenagers like to help this types of ngo who work for our community.
There are so many benefits for the teenagers to spare their leisure time in this activity, while it is also helpful to our community. Firstly, young people develop their ability and learn how communicate with the other's problem. They always try to solved the problems of others. " Teenagers are our next community members ". So that for the reason they should be required to do unpaid community work.
Secondly, they should try to develope their new ideas and new things. New generation have new ideas that's why our community can go ahead with the new things and also helpful in the technology. They should work as a teamwork and developing their skills. Also, they can boost their confidance and speak to others confidently.
Finally, they can get more benefit in this. They make their own thaughts. It also helps in their study because they should get ability, own ideas, intelligence and how to communicate with their own problems.
All in all, i believe that teenagers spend their free time in community work because it is benefit for them future and our society.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-06-12 | deepclearwater | 73 | view |
- School children are becoming far too dependent on computers. This is having an alarming effect on reading and writing skills. Teachers need to avoid using computers in the classroom at all costs and go back to teaching basic study skills. 67
- some people say that all secondary and higher secondary school students should be taught how to manage money as it is an important lifeskill 74
- The graph below presents the employment patterns in the USA between 1930 and 2010. 11
- Nowadays the way very people interact with each other has change because of technology in what ways has technology affected types of relationship people may this become a positive or negative development 73
- Some people say that schools do not make enough efforts in teaching young people to look after their health and they add that schools should undertake health education seriously Do you agree or disagree 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'thing'?
Suggestion: thing
Working for the society is a good things for our community. Many types of ngo ar...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...lity and learn how communicate with the others problem. They always try to solved the ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...w things. New generation have new ideas thats why our community can go ahead with the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e with their own problems. All in all, i believe that teenagers spend their free...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 1615.20841683 65% => OK
No of words: 218.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80733944954 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4274161425 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 176.041082164 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51376146789 0.561755894193 91% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 506.74238477 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1223891873 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.8666666667 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5333333333 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309797865984 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112163945043 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951456969795 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180885635339 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968145436152 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.0946893788 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.