The diagram below show comparison of literacy rate of males ane females in 1990 and 2000 in six states of country.
The bar chart shows the literacy rate of males and females in six states of the country in 1990 and 2000.
In that, literacy has increased among both genders in 1990 and 2000. State A showed rise in both males and females that for, 43% to 48% males and 25% to 30% females. State B in females and male literacy were near in 2000 it 84% and 85%. State C in the males literacy were highest compared to other states in graph rise was 70% to 78%. After that, state D figure were 60% to 65% for males and 30% to 42% for females for the year 1990 and 2000. State E in the females growth is higher 70% to 78% while, males growth 83% in 2000 compared to 78% in 1990. State F also showed growth in both ganders. Figures stood at 58% for males and 35% for females in 2000 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-21 | sandip patel army | 68 | view |
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Today our communications medicine and transport system all depend on computer technology Our reliance on computer technology has created a dangerous situation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and inc 73
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The diagram below shows changes in modes of transport chosen by travellers in a Europen country from 1950 to 1990 78
- The table below shows information about the Eiffel Tower and Peteonas Towers 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 237, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...eracy were near in 2000 it 84% and 85%. State C in the males literacy were highest co...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'males'' or 'male's', 'malis's'?
Suggestion: males'; male's; malis's
... in 2000 it 84% and 85%. State C in the males literacy were highest compared to other...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 458, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'females'' or 'female's'?
Suggestion: females'; female's
... the year 1990 and 2000. State E in the females growth is higher 70% to 78% while, male...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 625.0 965.302439024 65% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.08496732026 4.92477711251 83% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.96783047691 2.65546596893 74% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490196078431 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 175.5 283.868780488 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.2916258969 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.4444444444 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423788715318 0.215688989381 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220139650032 0.103423049105 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121374910979 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.439791861436 0.15604864568 282% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963852306522 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.3 13.2329268293 48% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 96.52 61.2550243902 158% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.0 10.3012195122 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.09 11.4140731707 53% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.13 8.06136585366 76% => Dale chall readability score is low.
difficult_words: 16.0 40.7170731707 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.