The graph below presents the employment patterns in the USA between 1930 and 2010.
In 1930, 75% of the labour force in the USA was employed in farming, fishing and foresting while only 10% worked in sales and office and trade. At the same time both the Industrial sector and the technical sector constituted just 2% of the workforce each. This situation changed only very gradually over the next 20 years, except for the technical workforce, which increased more than threefold.
However by 1980 there had been a significant change in the pattern of employment. While the farming, fishing and foresting employees had declined in number to 40% of the workforce, Industrial employees as well as technical had increased their share to 13% and 10% respectively.
Similarly the sales and office sectors did not increase until 1980. The most dramatic change could be seen by 2000, when the proportion of farming, fishing and foresting works reduced to just 10% while the three other major sectors had all increased to over 20% of the workforce.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Lovepreet123 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | samira@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | thuylinhmai | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | minhtuan | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | sivasankar | 67 | view |
- School children are becoming far too dependent on computers. This is having an alarming effect on reading and writing skills. Teachers need to avoid using computers in the classroom at all costs and go back to teaching basic study skills. 67
- Some people say that schools do not make enough efforts in teaching young people to look after their health and they add that schools should undertake health education seriously Do you agree or disagree 76
- Today our communications medicine and transport system all depend on computer technology Our reliance on computer technology has created a dangerous situation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and inc 73
- Nowadays the way very people interact with each other has change because of technology in what ways has technology affected types of relationship people may this become a positive or negative development 73
- Life cycle of frog 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...r share to 13% and 10% respectively. Similarly the sales and office sectors did not in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, well, while, except for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0125 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63838847595 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.101936905 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.571428571 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0522234077459 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291361881752 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504824575069 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.035051997128 0.15604864568 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315203419032 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.