Some people believe that traditional teaching method will disappear due to modern technology in 2050. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
It is argued that face-to-face learning would be replaced by online learning because of the development of technology in the year 2050. I partly agree with this opinion.
On the one hand, teaching through the Internet brings a diverse range of advantages for students. First, studying online gains more popularity due to its convenience. Indeed, students just seek a place which has the Internet connection, and they can start studying whenever they want. In another word, when students have to go out or take a long trip, they completely use an electrical device such as a mobile phone or a laptop to engage in online courses. Furthermore, students can save a considerable money when they take part in online classes. Take my self as an example, I decided to study an online English course with just 200 dollars for tuition fee instead of registering for an offline course which costs up to 500 dollars.. In addition, learners do not need to pay some additional fees such as fuel, gas and bus ticket for commuting.
On the other hand, I would also argue that the conventional teaching method has a variety of benefits. First of all, face-to-face learning is the best way for teachers to take care of their students. Indeed, teachers follow students, understand their personality and study ability in order to help them address some problems both at at school and social life. For instance, when students do not comprehend the lesson specifically, they can meet the teacher and teacher would explain again until they understand it clearly. Another important factor is that students can develop their interpersonal skills. Particularly, learners interact with others to enhance their communication skills through various activities in class such as teamwork or playing games. Furthermore, teacher can help their students become more confident and flexible when students have to prepare for a presentation or a seminar.
In conclusion, even though distance learning does wonder for students in the year and age, the conventional teaching method still plays a vital role in the educational process.
- Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?What solutions can you suggest? 78
- Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?What solutions can you suggest? 56
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 67
- People tend to work longer hours nowadays. Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and the society so working hours should be restricted. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people say that we do not need a printed newspaper anymore. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 642, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ine English course with just 200 dollars for tuition fee instead of registering f...
^^
Line 3, column 734, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ine course which costs up to 500 dollars.. In addition, learners do not need to pa...
^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: at
...to help them address some problems both at at school and social life. For instance, w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, still, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17302052786 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83904593147 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574780058651 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5978439686 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.764705882 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0701936713102 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0264369061052 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281305501127 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0525387703704 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180550751442 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.